Reopening a Closed Bankruptcy Case to Amend Schedules

Martin Long • Aug 26, 2019

Reopening a Closed Bankruptcy Case to Amend Schedules

This blog discusses a debtor who wishes to reopen a closed bankruptcy case in order to amend schedules.

Reopening Bankruptcy Cases to Claim Personal Injury Exemptions

The 10 th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel recently considered when debtors could reopen closed cases in order to amend their schedules. See In re Mendoza, 595 B.R. 849 (B.A.P. 10 th Cir., 2019). The Court looked at two cases where the debtors wanted to reopen their closed bankruptcy case in order to amend their schedules. In both cases the debtors failed to properly list their personal injury claims in their bankruptcy schedules. They received a bankruptcy discharge and their bankruptcy cases were closed. Later, they moved to reopen their cases so they could amend their schedules to list the personal injury claim as an asset and claim an exemption to the asset.

The Dollman case

Ms. Dolman suffered a personal injury in 2013 at a Walmart parking lot when she tripped over a shopping cart corral in disrepair. Later in 2013, her and her husband filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. They did not disclose the personal injury claim in the bankruptcy schedules. She received a bankruptcy discharge the same year. Two years later she filed a complaint against Walmart. Walmart’s attorney sought the dismissal of the complaint claiming Mrs. Dolman was not the holder of the personal injury claim. Walmart asserted the bankruptcy trustee was the holder because it was an asset of the bankruptcy estate.

The Mendoza case

Ms. Mendoza suffered a personal injury in 2014 as a result of being rear-ended in an automobile accident. In 2016 her and her husband filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Like the case above, they did not disclose the personal injury claim in the bankruptcy schedules. She received a bankruptcy discharge the same year and her case was closed. Later the same year Ms. Mendoza received a settlement on her personal injury claim and disclosed it to her attorney, who disclosed it to the Chapter 7 Trustee. The Chapter 7 Trustee claimed the settlement was an asset of the bankruptcy estate.

The Result

The Court ruled the closing of the bankruptcy case did not preclude the debtors from later reopening their cases to amend their schedules to list the personal injury claim and claim the exemption. The case may be viewed at the following link:

https://public.fastcase.com/ppbqSQpNDaJE%2F8PlIk0b…

Are you considering bankruptcy? With over 35 years of experience and a former Trustee for the U.S. Bankruptcy Court call LONG & LONG P.C. now at 303-832-2655, or visit www.denverbankruptcyattorney.net.

By Marty Long 03 May, 2024
SHOULD BOTH SPOUSES FILE BANKRUPTCY OR JUST ONE?
By Marty Long 03 Apr, 2024
The difference between secured debt and unsecured debt
By Marty Long 20 Mar, 2024
Pros and cons of Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
By Marty Long 09 Feb, 2024
THE FOUR MAIN PLAYERS IN A BANKRUPTCY
By Marty Long 25 Jan, 2024
Bankruptcy puts your family in a better financial position
11 Jan, 2024
Bankruptcy can often help a small business
More Posts
Share by: